|
|||||
Research - Case Studies - McKinley Elementary School
Thinking Maps Training Thinking Maps training and instruction have improved teacher effectiveness resulting in enhancing student academic results, especially English Language Learners.
English Language Learners (ELL) represent the majority of our students at McKinley School. We wanted to prove that the instructional use of Thinking Maps® as a “non-linguistic representation” (Marzano, Classroom Instruction That Works), improved the academic skills of our ELL students. Standardized test scores as well as District Assessments and other qualitative measures will support this objective. Thinking Maps® teacher survey; McKinley School; February 6th, 2007 Before T.M. training and coaching, to what degree were you aware of the thinking processes during instruction time? After T.M. training and coaching, to what degree were you aware of the thinking processes during instruction time? Before T.M. to what degree were you aware of your students’ ability to consciously transfer the eight thinking processes to content learning? After T.M. to what degree were you aware of your students’ ability to consciously transfer the eight thinking processes to content learning? The data gathered over the past three years through the Teams Assisting School Success (TASS) process clearly indicates that teachers are using the Thinking Maps® regularly during the instructional day. Download TASS Walkthrough document (PDF File) As seen in the walkthrough instrument, the term graphic organizers is an indicator of effective teaching practices. The McKinley team used this category explicitly to indicate the use of Thinking Maps® in classrooms. See the Menu on the left column at the top of this page for more sections in this case study on McKinley Elementary School in San Jose, California. |
|||||
|
|||||